Space Shuttle Challenger disaster - Wikipedia

 

space shuttle challenger case study

paper addresses an aspect of the Challenger accident’s history not addressed in the case study.] Abstract: Severe icing on the space shuttle Challenger’s launch pad should have halted the launch on the morning of January 28, One Rockwell International manager told his. The analysis continues by asking, “Why?”, moving to the right of the cause-effect relationship above. The astronauts’ deaths were due to the loss of Challenger, which was caused by an external tank explosion: the space shuttle broke apart because gasses in the external fuel tank mixed, exploded, and tore the space shuttle apart. The purpose of case studies in general is to provide us with the context—the technical details—of an engineering decision in which an ethical principle may have been violated. Case Study of Challenger Disaster On January 28, , the NASA space Shuttle Challenger burst into a ball of flame 73 seconds.



Summary of the Incident. The Challenger shuttle crew, of seven astronauts -- including the specialties of pilot, aerospace engineers, space shuttle challenger case study, and scientists-- died tragically in the explosion of their spacecraft during the launch of STSL from the Kennedy Space Center about a.

The explosion occurred 73 seconds into the flight as a result of a leak in one of two Solid Rocket Boosters that ignited the main liquid fuel tank.

The NASA investigational commission's report on the incident cited the cause of the disaster as a failure of an "O-ring" seal in the solid-fuel rocket on the Space Shuttle Challenger's right side. The faulty design of the seal coupled with the unusually cold weather of the launch date, let hot gases leak through the joint. This allowed booster rocket flames to pass through the failed seal, further enlarging the small hole.

Ultimately, the flames proceeded to burn through the Space Shuttle Challenger's external fuel tank and through one of the supports that attached the booster to the side of the tank. The booster broke loose and collided with the tank, piercing the fuel tank's side.

Liquid space shuttle challenger case study and liquid space shuttle challenger case study fuels from the tank and booster mixed and ignited, causing the Space Shuttle Challenger to tear apart. The commission not only found fault with a failed sealant ring but also with the officials at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA who allowed the shuttle launch to take place despite concerns voiced by NASA engineers regarding the safety of the launch.

The following ethical concerns of the events leading up to the incident will be discussed in the case study:. Because the O-rings were never tested at temperatures as low as the conditions during the actual launch, they should have taken a "better safe than sorry" approach to the situation rather than a "let's see what happens" approach, space shuttle challenger case study, especially when people's lives are at stake.

However, because this component is so critical, the backups were in place solely for redundancy, not to act as the primary part. Pages Blog. Child pages. STS Wiki Pages. Browse pages. JIRA links. Summary of the Incident The Challenger shuttle crew, of seven astronauts -- including the specialties of pilot, aerospace engineers, and scientists-- died tragically in the explosion of their spacecraft during the launch of STSL from the Kennedy Space Center about a.

No labels. Powered by Atlassian Confluence 5. Report a bug Atlassian News.

 

 

space shuttle challenger case study

 

In , Allan J. McDonald, former director of the Space Shuttle Solid Motor Rocket Project for Morton-Thiokol, Inc. published his book Truth, Lies, and O-Rings: Inside the Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster. Up to that point, no one directly involved in the decision to launch Challenger had published a memoir about the tebneriffas.tkies: Rogers Commission. Dec 10,  · The Challenger shuttle crew, of seven astronauts -- including the specialties of pilot, aerospace engineers, and scientists-- died tragically in the explosion of their spacecraft during the launch of STSL from the Kennedy Space Center about a.m., EST, on January 28, A Little About This Project • Design Modules Based on Appropriate Engineering Case Studies –Space Shuttle Challenger (Risk assessment, dissent, whistleblowing) –Chernobyl Power Plant (Professional responsibility, liability) –Exxon Valdez Oil Spill (Environmental issues, safety, public service).